Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
28.6%
in 2021
Ecuador
40.8%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
15th
Ecuador rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 40.8% against 28.6% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 12.2%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 15th and Ecuador ranks 12th of 27 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.8% | 39.5% | 13.7% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 30.8% | 36.1% | 5.4% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 28.6% | 49.3% | 20.8% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 40.8% against 28.6% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 12.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 15th and Ecuador ranks 12th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group