Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Serbia
Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 70.1% in 2022. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia is 70.1%, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 47.5% on the previous year and up 63.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia peaked at 73.4% in 2018 and was at its lowest, 41.9%, in 2015.
Serbia ranks 6th of 27 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Serbia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 63.0% | — |
| 2010 | 59.4% | -5.6% |
| 2013 | 42.9% | -27.8% |
| 2015 | 41.9% | -2.4% |
| 2018 | 73.4% | +75.1% |
| 2019 | 60.2% | -17.9% |
| 2021 | 47.5% | -21.1% |
| 2022 | 70.1% | +47.5% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 70.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 63.0%, 1.1× the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 70.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 39.2%, 1.8× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.0% | 63.0% | 63.0% | 1 |
| 2010s | 55.6% | 41.9% | 73.4% | 5 |
| 2020s | 58.8% | 47.5% | 70.1% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 3 Viet Nam 103.6% compare
- 4 Kyrgyzstan 81.7% compare
- 5 Mongolia 72.4% compare
- 7 South Africa 58.1% compare
- 8 Republic of Moldova 55.9% compare
- 9 Georgia 55.5% compare
More work & labour data for Serbia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7737 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7205 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.8268 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.14 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1128 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 5,121 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,326 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,850 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,852 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 3,702 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Serbia was 70.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 73.4% in 2018.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 41.9% in 2015.
- How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Serbia ranks 6th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 63.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group