Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
55.5%
in 2021
Serbia
70.1%
in 2022
Georgia rank
9th
Serbia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 70.1% against 55.5% in Georgia, a difference of 14.6%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.9% | 54.6% | 5.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 55.5% | 47.5% | 8.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 70.1% against 55.5% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and Serbia?
- 14.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group