Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 27.1% in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia is 27.1%, measured in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.8% on the previous year and down 92.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia peaked at 383.6% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 22.6%, in 2014.
That places Georgia 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 383.6% | — |
| 2012 | 31.3% | -91.8% |
| 2013 | 33.6% | +7.3% |
| 2014 | 22.6% | -32.7% |
| 2015 | 30.5% | +34.9% |
| 2016 | 54.5% | +79.0% |
| 2017 | 29.7% | -45.6% |
| 2018 | 33.9% | +14.0% |
| 2019 | 30.3% | -10.4% |
| 2020 | 25.4% | -16.3% |
| 2021 | 27.1% | +6.8% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 27.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 27.1%, 1.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 27.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 25.2%, 1.1× the median. (19 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 72.2% | 22.6% | 383.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 26.3% | 25.4% | 27.1% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Georgia was 27.1% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 383.6% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 22.6% in 2014.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Georgia ranks 14th out of 31 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 92.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group