Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Argentina
Argentina: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 28.1% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Argentina, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2022, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina stood at 28.1%.
That represents a change of up 21.2% on the previous year and down 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina peaked at 47.1% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 15.3%, in 2016.
Argentina ranks 13th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 10 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Argentina, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 47.1% | — |
| 2010 | 44.7% | -5.1% |
| 2013 | 42.1% | -5.8% |
| 2016 | 15.3% | -63.6% |
| 2017 | 28.9% | +88.8% |
| 2018 | 29.0% | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 25.0% | -13.7% |
| 2020 | 22.3% | -10.8% |
| 2021 | 23.2% | +3.9% |
| 2022 | 28.1% | +21.2% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 28.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 25.2%, 1.1× the median. (19 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 28.1% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 25.2%, 1.1× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.1% | 47.1% | 47.1% | 1 |
| 2010s | 30.9% | 15.3% | 44.7% | 6 |
| 2020s | 24.5% | 22.3% | 28.1% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
More work & labour data for Argentina
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7783 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7715 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7851 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.514 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 52,564 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 2,664 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 19,145 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 19,111 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 38,256 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Argentina was 28.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 47.1% in 2006.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.3% in 2016.
- How does Argentina rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Argentina ranks 13th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group