Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 1st Domestic urban in Vietnam

Vietnam: Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 1st Domestic urban was 37.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
37.6%
World rank
5th
of 31 countries
All-time high
37.6%
in 2020
All-time low
9.1%
in 2006
Years of data
5
2006–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Vietnam, 2006–2020

102030402006201320202006: 9.12010: 27.42012: 19.72014: 16.62020: 37.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Vietnam is 37.6%, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 37.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Vietnam peaked at 37.6% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 9.1%, in 2006.

That places Vietnam 5th out of 31 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 1st Domestic urban in Vietnam, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Vietnam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 9.1% —
2010 27.4% +199.4%
2012 19.7% -28.1%
2014 16.6% -15.5%
2020 37.6% +126.2%

Vietnam compared with similar countries

  • Vietnam's 37.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.3%, 1.5× the median. (19 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 1
2010s 21.2% 16.6% 27.4% 3
2020s 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 1

Countries ranked near Vietnam

  1. 2 Romania 45.7% compare
  2. 3 Thailand 44.8% compare
  3. 4 Dominican Republic 37.7% compare
  4. 6 Moldova 35.8% compare
  5. 7 Georgia 35.1% compare
  6. 8 Costa Rica 33.1% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Vietnam

All data for Vietnam →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Vietnam?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Vietnam was 37.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Vietnam?
The highest recorded value was 37.6% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Vietnam?
The lowest recorded value was 9.1% in 2006.
How does Vietnam rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
Vietnam ranks 5th out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Vietnam?
Over the last ten years it is up 37.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Vietnam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Vietnam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Vietnam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 316 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group