Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador
Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 13.4% in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 13.4% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 41.6% on the previous year and down 62.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador peaked at 43.5% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 9.5%, in 2021.
Ecuador ranks 27th of 30 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 32.5% | — |
| 2010 | 29.9% | -8.1% |
| 2011 | 43.5% | +45.4% |
| 2012 | 35.9% | -17.4% |
| 2014 | 24.6% | -31.5% |
| 2015 | 11.9% | -51.4% |
| 2016 | 16.9% | +41.2% |
| 2017 | 12.9% | -23.8% |
| 2018 | 15.2% | +18.5% |
| 2019 | 14.5% | -4.8% |
| 2020 | 11.1% | -23.2% |
| 2021 | 9.5% | -14.7% |
| 2022 | 13.4% | +41.6% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 13.4% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.1%, 58% of the median. (18 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 13.4% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 22.8%, 59% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.5% | 32.5% | 32.5% | 1 |
| 2010s | 22.8% | 11.9% | 43.5% | 9 |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 9.5% | 13.4% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Ecuador was 13.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 43.5% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.5% in 2021.
- How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Ecuador ranks 27th out of 30 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 62.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group