Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 12.3% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 12.3% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and down 3.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus peaked at 20.6% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 10.8%, in 2010.
Belarus ranks 28th of 30 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 10.9% | — |
| 2009 | 12.7% | +16.7% |
| 2010 | 10.8% | -14.8% |
| 2012 | 20.4% | +88.1% |
| 2013 | 20.6% | +1.2% |
| 2014 | 17.1% | -17.2% |
| 2015 | 12.8% | -24.9% |
| 2016 | 12.9% | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 12.1% | -6.3% |
| 2018 | 12.4% | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 12.3% | -1.5% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 12.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 22.0%, 56% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 12.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.1%, 53% of the median. (18 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.8% | 10.9% | 12.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 10.8% | 20.6% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Belarus was 12.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 20.6% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.8% in 2010.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Belarus ranks 28th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group