Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia
Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 64.2% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia, 2007–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Mongolia recorded 64.2% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in 2020.
The figure is down 5.5% on the previous year and up 47.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia peaked at 70.5% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 43.6%, in 2010.
Mongolia ranks 16th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 46.2% | — |
| 2009 | 53.7% | +16.3% |
| 2010 | 43.6% | -18.8% |
| 2011 | 55.3% | +26.9% |
| 2012 | 63.6% | +14.9% |
| 2014 | 49.0% | -22.9% |
| 2016 | 70.5% | +44.0% |
| 2018 | 68.0% | -3.7% |
| 2020 | 64.2% | -5.5% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's 64.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.9%, 1.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.9% | 46.2% | 53.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 58.3% | 43.6% | 70.5% | 6 |
| 2020s | 64.2% | 64.2% | 64.2% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 13 Kyrgyzstan 76.4% compare
- 14 South Africa 73.7% compare
- 15 Chile 69.7% compare
- 17 Brazil 61.1% compare
- 18 Viet Nam 54.6% compare
- 19 Kosovo 54.4% compare
- 19 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 54.4% compare
More work & labour data for Mongolia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1039 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1076 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0999 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.07 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.05 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,167 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 908.11 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,756 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,763 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,519 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia was 64.2% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 70.5% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.6% in 2010.
- How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Mongolia ranks 16th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group