Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Brazil
61.1%
in 2022
Mongolia
64.2%
in 2020
Brazil rank
17th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 64.2% against 61.1% in Brazil, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.8% | 53.7% | 11.1% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 57.8% | 64.3% | 6.5% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 70.6% | 64.2% | 6.4% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 64.2% against 61.1% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 3.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group