Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 56.7% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 56.7% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in 2020.
The figure is down 4.0% on the previous year and up 16.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 66.7% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 44.9%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 30 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 44.9% | — |
| 2011 | 48.6% | +8.1% |
| 2012 | 66.7% | +37.3% |
| 2013 | 58.1% | -12.8% |
| 2014 | 56.0% | -3.7% |
| 2015 | 58.7% | +4.8% |
| 2016 | 56.6% | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 56.7% | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 57.4% | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 59.1% | +2.8% |
| 2020 | 56.7% | -4.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 56.7% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 61.6%, 92% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.9% | 44.9% | 44.9% | 1 |
| 2010s | 57.5% | 48.6% | 66.7% | 9 |
| 2020s | 56.7% | 56.7% | 56.7% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Kyrgyzstan was 56.7% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 66.7% in 2012.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 44.9% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th out of 30 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group