Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Chile
55.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
56.7%
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 56.7% against 55.5% in Chile, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.2% | 44.9% | 8.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 41.0% | 55.5% | 14.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 31.8% | 56.7% | 24.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 56.7% against 55.5% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group