Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Peru
Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 43.0% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Peru, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Peru is 43.0%, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 13.4% on the previous year and down 4.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Peru peaked at 63.7% in 2008 and was at its lowest, 42.7%, in 2014.
That places Peru 30th out of 34 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Peru, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 63.7% | — |
| 2009 | 53.8% | -15.6% |
| 2010 | 54.8% | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 48.8% | -11.0% |
| 2012 | 45.1% | -7.6% |
| 2013 | 46.4% | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 42.7% | -7.9% |
| 2015 | 46.2% | +8.1% |
| 2016 | 46.0% | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 49.6% | +7.7% |
| 2018 | 44.6% | -10.1% |
| 2019 | 45.3% | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 44.6% | -1.5% |
| 2021 | 49.7% | +11.4% |
| 2022 | 43.0% | -13.4% |
Peru compared with similar countries
- Peru's 43.0% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 72.9%, 59% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Peru's 43.0% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 47.1%, 91% of the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.7% | 53.8% | 63.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 46.9% | 42.7% | 54.8% | 10 |
| 2020s | 45.7% | 43.0% | 49.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Peru
More work & labour data for Peru
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.4349 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.4225 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.4473 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.6786 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 35,667 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,953 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 19,027 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 19,136 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 38,163 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Peru?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Peru was 43.0% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 63.7% in 2008.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 42.7% in 2014.
- How does Peru rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Peru ranks 30th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group