Panama vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Panama
42.4%
in 2023
Peru
43.0%
in 2022
Panama rank
31st
Peru rank
30th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Panama
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 43.0% against 42.4% in Panama, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Panama ranks 31st and Peru ranks 30th of 34 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.7% | 58.7% | 4.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 46.3% | 46.9% | 0.6% | Peru |
| 2020s | 40.1% | 49.7% | 9.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Panama or Peru?
- Peru, at 43.0% against 42.4% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Panama and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Panama ranks 31st and Peru ranks 30th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group