Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 47.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 47.7% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 43.9% on the previous year and up 104.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 47.7% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 23.3%, in 2009.
That places Poland 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 28.2% | — |
| 2006 | 27.4% | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 27.2% | -0.6% |
| 2008 | 24.6% | -9.8% |
| 2009 | 23.3% | -5.0% |
| 2010 | 27.3% | +17.0% |
| 2011 | 28.9% | +5.7% |
| 2012 | 27.8% | -3.6% |
| 2015 | 35.6% | +27.9% |
| 2016 | 33.6% | -5.7% |
| 2017 | 33.2% | -1.2% |
| 2019 | 47.7% | +43.9% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 47.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 27.6%, 1.7× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 47.7% is above the median for high income countries, which is 20.1%, 2.4× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.1% | 23.3% | 28.2% | 5 |
| 2010s | 33.4% | 27.3% | 47.7% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland was 47.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 47.7% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 23.3% in 2009.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 104.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group