Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
46.6%
in 2022
Poland
47.7%
in 2019
Armenia rank
4th
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 47.7% against 46.6% in Armenia, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.4% | 23.9% | 7.4% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.0% | 33.4% | 0.6% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 47.7% against 46.6% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Poland?
- 1.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group