Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 25.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus is 25.3%, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 62.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 83.4% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 15.0%, in 2008.
That places Belarus 9th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 15.0% | — |
| 2009 | 15.6% | +4.3% |
| 2010 | 17.7% | +13.5% |
| 2012 | 18.5% | +4.0% |
| 2013 | 21.5% | +16.5% |
| 2014 | 25.1% | +17.0% |
| 2015 | 24.3% | -3.4% |
| 2016 | 83.4% | +243.4% |
| 2017 | 23.9% | -71.3% |
| 2018 | 25.3% | +5.8% |
| 2019 | 25.3% | +0.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 25.3% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 27.6%, 92% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 25.3% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.3%, 1.4× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.3% | 15.0% | 15.6% | 2 |
| 2010s | 29.5% | 17.7% | 83.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 7 Brazil 36.0% compare
- 8 Kazakhstan 30.0% compare
- 10 Romania 24.7% compare
- 11 Argentina 24.6% compare
- 12 Kyrgyzstan 24.3% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 25.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 83.4% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.0% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 9th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 62.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group