Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
25.3%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
24.3%
in 2020
Belarus rank
9th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 25.3% against 24.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 25.3% against 24.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 9th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group