Afghanistan vs Low income: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Afghanistan
81.1%
in 2025
Low income
70.9%
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
3rd
Low income rank
1st
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Afghanistan
- Low income
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 81.1% against 70.9% in Low income, a difference of 10.2%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Low income's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Low income ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.6% | 69.4% | 25.2% | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 92.5% | 69.4% | 23.1% | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 83.3% | 69.4% | 13.9% | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 80.4% | 70.5% | 9.9% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Afghanistan or Low income?
- Afghanistan, at 81.1% against 70.9% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Afghanistan and Low income?
- 10.2%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Low income?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Low income rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Low income ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.