Chagai vs Eswatini: Unemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)
Unemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Chagai
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 33.65 against 6.35 in Chagai, a difference of 27.3.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 5.3 times Chagai's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Chagai ranks 1st and Eswatini ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chagai | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.54 | 22.03 | 15.49 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 5.58 | 26.71 | 21.13 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 7.4 | 25.21 | 17.81 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 6.24 | 34.31 | 28.07 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher unemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Chagai or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 33.65 against 6.35 in Chagai as of 2027.
- What is the difference in unemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Chagai and Eswatini?
- 27.3, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Eswatini?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
- How do Chagai and Eswatini rank globally for unemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Chagai ranks 1st and Eswatini ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Unemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The unemployment rate conveys the number of persons who are unemployed as a percent of the labour force (i.e., the employed plus the unemployed). The unemployed comprise all persons of working age who were: a) without work during the reference period, i.e. were not in paid employment or self-employment; b) currently available for work, i.e. were available for paid employment or self-employment during the reference period; and c) seeking work, i.e. had taken specific steps in a specified recent period to seek paid employment or self-employment. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.