Malta vs Suriname: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons over time
- Malta
- Suriname
How they compare
Malta currently reports 10,034 against 9,699 in Suriname, a difference of 335.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.
Malta ranks 171st and Suriname ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,051 | 7,670 | 1,619 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 7,264 | 8,960 | 1,696 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 9,660 | 9,209 | 451.7 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total weekly hours worked of employed persons, Malta or Suriname?
- Malta, at 10,034 against 9,699 in Suriname as of 2027.
- What is the difference in total weekly hours worked of employed persons between Malta and Suriname?
- 335, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for total weekly hours worked of employed persons?
- Malta ranks 171st and Suriname ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings.This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked of employed persons in their main job. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.