Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates)

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
1.03 million
in 2027
Zimbabwe
293,414
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Zimbabwe
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M200520162027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: Low income currently reports 1.03 million against 293,414 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 734,506.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: Low income's figure about 3.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: Low income has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 87 groups.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 833,858 171,029 662,829 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2010s 950,707 184,913 765,794 Asia and the Pacific: Low income
2020s 992,468 253,736 738,731 Asia and the Pacific: Low income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total weekly hours worked of employed persons, Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Zimbabwe?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income, at 1.03 million against 293,414 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in total weekly hours worked of employed persons between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
734,506, with Asia and the Pacific: Low income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for total weekly hours worked of employed persons?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/total-weekly-hours-worked-of-employed-persons-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/total-weekly-hours-worked-of-employed-persons-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/zimbabwe/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Zimbabwe: Total weekly hours worked of employed persons</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total weekly hours worked of employed persons (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings.This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to total weekly hours actually worked of employed persons in their main job. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.