Georgia vs Latvia: Time-related underemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)

Georgia
2.65
in 2025
Latvia
2.48
in 2024
Georgia rank
52nd
Latvia rank
55th

Time-related underemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time

  • Georgia
  • Latvia
02468200120132025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 2.65 against 2.48 in Latvia, a difference of 0.17.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 55th of 90 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 6.27 2.75 3.52 Georgia
2020s 4.04 2.87 1.17 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13), Georgia or Latvia?
Georgia, at 2.65 against 2.48 in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Georgia and Latvia?
0.17, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
Georgia ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 55th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Latvia: Time-related underemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/georgia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/georgia/latvia/">Georgia vs Latvia: Time-related underemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,573 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.