Nepal vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)

Nepal
7.36
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
3.96
in 2027
Nepal rank
54th
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
55th

Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Nepal
  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
02468200520162027

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 7.36 against 3.96 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, a difference of 3.4.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.9 times South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 54th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 7.47 3.43 4.04 Nepal
2010s 7.44 3.25 4.18 Nepal
2020s 7.56 4.63 2.93 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Nepal or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
Nepal, at 7.36 against 3.96 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Nepal and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
3.4, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Nepal and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
Nepal ranks 54th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/nepal/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/nepal/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/">Nepal vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.