Ghana vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)

Ghana
7.23
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
3.96
in 2027
Ghana rank
57th
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
55th

Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Ghana
  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
246810200520162027

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 7.23 against 3.96 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, a difference of 3.27.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.8 times South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ahead.

Ghana ranks 57th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 2.76 3.43 0.6712 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2010s 6.93 3.25 3.68 Ghana
2020s 7.53 4.63 2.91 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Ghana or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
Ghana, at 7.23 against 3.96 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Ghana and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
3.27, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Ghana and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
Ghana ranks 57th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/ghana/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/ghana/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/">Ghana vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.