Gabon vs Guyana: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Gabon
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 8.92 against 8.65 in Gabon, a difference of 0.27.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Gabon ranks 30th and Guyana ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.27 | 12.21 | 3.94 | Guyana |
| 2010s | 8.6 | 12.59 | 3.99 | Guyana |
| 2020s | 8.75 | 9.07 | 0.3106 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Gabon or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 8.92 against 8.65 in Gabon as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Gabon and Guyana?
- 0.27, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Guyana?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Gabon and Guyana rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Gabon ranks 30th and Guyana ranks 27th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.