Comoros vs Fiji: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Comoros
- Fiji
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 2.74 against 2.7 in Fiji, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.
Comoros ranks 128th and Fiji ranks 129th of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.33 | 2.53 | 0.1946 | Fiji |
| 2010s | 2.39 | 2.6 | 0.2047 | Fiji |
| 2020s | 2.75 | 2.7 | 0.0559 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Comoros or Fiji?
- Comoros, at 2.74 against 2.7 in Fiji as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Comoros and Fiji?
- 0.04, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Fiji?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Comoros and Fiji rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Comoros ranks 128th and Fiji ranks 129th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.