Chile vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)

Chile
6.73
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
3.54
in 2027
Chile rank
65th
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income rank
65th

Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Chile
  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
2.557.51012.515200520162027

How they compare

Chile currently reports 6.73 against 3.54 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income, a difference of 3.19.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.9 times South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 65th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 65th of 188 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 14.43 4.55 9.88 Chile
2010s 12.73 3.89 8.84 Chile
2020s 6.82 3.76 3.06 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Chile or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
Chile, at 6.73 against 3.54 in South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Chile and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
3.19, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Chile and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
Chile ranks 65th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 65th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/chile/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/chile/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-lower-middle-income/">Chile vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.