Latvia vs Mauritius: Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 21.9 against 15.87 in Mauritius, a difference of 6.03.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 90 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (previous ilo definition - icls13), Latvia or Mauritius?
- Latvia, at 21.9 against 15.87 in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 6.03, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for time-related underemployment (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- Latvia ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.