Australia vs Republic of Korea: Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)

Australia
882.8
in 2025
Republic of Korea
738.61
in 2025
Australia rank
17th
Republic of Korea rank
20th

Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time

  • Australia
  • Republic of Korea
05001.0k1.5k200120132025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 882.8 against 738.61 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 144.19.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Korea's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 17th and Republic of Korea ranks 20th of 90 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2010s 1,197 425.25 772.06 Australia
2020s 1,017 854.51 162.51 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (previous ilo definition - icls13), Australia or Republic of Korea?
Australia, at 882.8 against 738.61 in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Australia and Republic of Korea?
144.19, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Republic of Korea?
14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Australia and Republic of Korea rank globally for time-related underemployment (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
Australia ranks 17th and Republic of Korea ranks 20th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Republic of Korea: Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/australia/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/australia/korea-rep/">Australia vs Republic of Korea: Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
90 places, 1,573 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.