Philippines vs Tanzania: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) over time
- Philippines
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 4,672 against 3,771 in Philippines, a difference of 901.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 9th and Tanzania ranks 8th of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,757 | 1,597 | 1,160 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 3,134 | 3,039 | 94.46 | Philippines |
| 2020s | 3,718 | 4,226 | 507.17 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Philippines or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 4,672 against 3,771 in Philippines as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Philippines and Tanzania?
- 901, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tanzania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Philippines and Tanzania rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Philippines ranks 9th and Tanzania ranks 8th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.