Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 137.39 against 136.33 in Poland, a difference of 1.06.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Poland ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd and Poland ranks 94th of 188 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.92 | 474.18 | 398.26 | Poland |
| 2010s | 97.95 | 401.65 | 303.71 | Poland |
| 2020s | 129.09 | 151.41 | 22.32 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Papua New Guinea or Poland?
- Papua New Guinea, at 137.39 against 136.33 in Poland as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Papua New Guinea and Poland?
- 1.06, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Poland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Poland rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd and Poland ranks 94th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.