Macao vs East Timor: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) over time
- Macao
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 2.56 against 2.18 in Macao, a difference of 0.38.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times Macao's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 183rd and East Timor ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.15 | 0.7114 | 4.44 | Macao |
| 2010s | 2.68 | 2.84 | 0.1652 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 2.36 | 2.42 | 0.0657 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Macao or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 2.56 against 2.18 in Macao as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Macao and East Timor?
- 0.38, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Macao and East Timor rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Macao ranks 183rd and East Timor ranks 181st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.