Latvia vs Palestine, State of: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Latvia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 21.41 against 17.98 in Latvia, a difference of 3.43.
That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Latvia ranks 152nd and Palestine, State of ranks 149th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.23 | 17.71 | 19.52 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 43.75 | 23.63 | 20.12 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 29.49 | 20.72 | 8.77 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Latvia or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 21.41 against 17.98 in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Latvia and Palestine, State of?
- 3.43, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Palestine, State of?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Palestine, State of rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Latvia ranks 152nd and Palestine, State of ranks 149th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.