Hong Kong vs Lebanon: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Hong Kong
- Lebanon
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 39.33 against 34.32 in Lebanon, a difference of 5.01.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 128th and Lebanon ranks 131st of 188 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.4 | 35.55 | 47.85 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 55.06 | 45.95 | 9.11 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 90.27 | 36.94 | 53.32 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Hong Kong or Lebanon?
- Hong Kong, at 39.33 against 34.32 in Lebanon as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Hong Kong and Lebanon?
- 5.01, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Lebanon?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Lebanon rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Hong Kong ranks 128th and Lebanon ranks 131st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.