Guinea vs South Sudan: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 384.47 against 331.28 in Guinea, a difference of 53.19.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 63rd and South Sudan ranks 61st of 188 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 225.87 | 262.84 | 36.97 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 250.15 | 338.17 | 88.02 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 290.09 | 367.65 | 77.56 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Guinea or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 384.47 against 331.28 in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Guinea and South Sudan?
- 53.19, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and South Sudan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Guinea ranks 63rd and South Sudan ranks 61st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.