Eritrea vs Papua New Guinea: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Eritrea
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 143.33 against 137.39 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 5.94.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 91st and Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd of 188 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.51 | 75.92 | 20.59 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 108.98 | 97.95 | 11.04 | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 130.57 | 129.09 | 1.48 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Eritrea or Papua New Guinea?
- Eritrea, at 143.33 against 137.39 in Papua New Guinea as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Eritrea and Papua New Guinea?
- 5.94, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Eritrea and Papua New Guinea rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Eritrea ranks 91st and Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.