Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 60.72 against 53.89 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6.83.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 121st and Gabon ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.89 | 31.51 | 5.62 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 37.55 | 43.83 | 6.28 | Gabon |
| 2020s | 49.62 | 56.09 | 6.47 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Equatorial Guinea or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 60.72 against 53.89 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
- 6.83, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Gabon rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 121st and Gabon ranks 118th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.