Eastern Europe vs Libya: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Eastern Europe
- Libya
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 373.32 against 180.76 in Libya, a difference of 192.56.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 2.1 times Libya's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 82nd and Libya ranks 83rd of 87 groups.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,751 | 135.35 | 1,615 | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 1,491 | 152.25 | 1,339 | Eastern Europe |
| 2020s | 560.17 | 171.53 | 388.64 | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Eastern Europe or Libya?
- Eastern Europe, at 373.32 against 180.76 in Libya as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Eastern Europe and Libya?
- 192.56, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Libya?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Eastern Europe and Libya rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Eastern Europe ranks 82nd and Libya ranks 83rd of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.