Chile vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)

Chile
644.02
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
8,144
in 2027
Chile rank
46th
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
43rd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Chile
  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k200520162027

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income currently reports 8,144 against 644.02 in Chile, a difference of 7,500.

That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's figure about 12.6 times Chile's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 46th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 43rd of 188 countries.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 963.25 5,221 4,257 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2010s 1,058 5,731 4,674 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2020s 610.17 9,055 8,445 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Chile or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, at 8,144 against 644.02 in Chile as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Chile and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
7,500, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Chile and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Chile ranks 46th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/chile/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/chile/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/">Chile vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.