Central Asia vs Congo: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Central Asia
- Congo
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 701.5 against 212.75 in Congo, a difference of 488.75.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 3.3 times Congo's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 78th and Congo ranks 79th of 87 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 517.96 | 119.86 | 398.11 | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 773.54 | 150.95 | 622.59 | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 701.08 | 190.31 | 510.77 | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Central Asia or Congo?
- Central Asia, at 701.5 against 212.75 in Congo as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Central Asia and Congo?
- 488.75, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Congo?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Central Asia and Congo rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Central Asia ranks 78th and Congo ranks 79th of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.