CARICOM vs El Salvador: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- CARICOM
- El Salvador
How they compare
CARICOM currently reports 752 against 215.95 in El Salvador, a difference of 536.05.
That makes CARICOM's figure about 3.5 times El Salvador's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, CARICOM has been ahead every year.
CARICOM ranks 77th and El Salvador ranks 78th of 87 groups.
CARICOM has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | CARICOM | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 565 | 187.99 | 377.02 | CARICOM |
| 2010s | 652.74 | 175.09 | 477.65 | CARICOM |
| 2020s | 729.23 | 205.27 | 523.96 | CARICOM |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), CARICOM or El Salvador?
- CARICOM, at 752 against 215.95 in El Salvador as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between CARICOM and El Salvador?
- 536.05, with CARICOM ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for CARICOM and El Salvador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do CARICOM and El Salvador rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- CARICOM ranks 77th and El Salvador ranks 78th of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.