Cameroon vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)

Cameroon
1,158
in 2027
Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income
19,070
in 2027
Cameroon rank
31st
Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income rank
28th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Cameroon
  • Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200520162027

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income currently reports 19,070 against 1,158 in Cameroon, a difference of 17,912.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income's figure about 16.5 times Cameroon's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 31st and Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income ranks 28th of 188 countries.

Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 836.58 16,461 15,625 Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income
2010s 903.41 17,661 16,758 Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income
2020s 1,068 19,457 18,389 Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Cameroon or Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income?
Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income, at 19,070 against 1,158 in Cameroon as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Cameroon and Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income?
17,912, with Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Cameroon and Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Cameroon ranks 31st and Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/cameroon/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/cameroon/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-upper-middle-income/">Cameroon vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.