Belgium vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)

Belgium
272.51
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
1,137
in 2027
Belgium rank
70th
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income rank
73rd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Belgium
  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
05001.0k1.5k200520162027

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income currently reports 1,137 against 272.51 in Belgium, a difference of 864.49.

That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income's figure about 4.2 times Belgium's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 70th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 73rd of 188 countries.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income Difference Ahead
2000s 198.57 927.41 728.85 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
2010s 207.47 1,233 1,026 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income
2020s 242.76 1,216 972.8 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Belgium or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income, at 1,137 against 272.51 in Belgium as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Belgium and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income?
864.49, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Belgium and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Belgium ranks 70th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/belgium/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/belgium/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/">Belgium vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: High income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.