Barbados vs Comoros: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Barbados
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 8.64 against 8.07 in Barbados, a difference of 0.57.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Barbados ranks 169th and Comoros ranks 167th of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.72 | 3.28 | 0.5654 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 4.77 | 4.68 | 0.0975 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 8.88 | 7.88 | 1 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Barbados or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 8.64 against 8.07 in Barbados as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Barbados and Comoros?
- 0.57, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Comoros?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Barbados and Comoros rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Barbados ranks 169th and Comoros ranks 167th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.