Australia vs South-Eastern Asia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)

Australia
965.2
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia
13,365
in 2027
Australia rank
36th
South-Eastern Asia rank
35th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Australia
  • South-Eastern Asia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200520162027

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia currently reports 13,365 against 965.2 in Australia, a difference of 12,400.

That makes South-Eastern Asia's figure about 13.8 times Australia's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 36th and South-Eastern Asia ranks 35th of 188 countries.

South-Eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia South-Eastern Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 733.75 10,403 9,669 South-Eastern Asia
2010s 996.66 10,838 9,841 South-Eastern Asia
2020s 1,010 14,370 13,360 South-Eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Australia or South-Eastern Asia?
South-Eastern Asia, at 13,365 against 965.2 in Australia as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Australia and South-Eastern Asia?
12,400, with South-Eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South-Eastern Asia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Australia and South-Eastern Asia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Australia ranks 36th and South-Eastern Asia ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs South-Eastern Asia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/australia/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/australia/south-eastern-asia/">Australia vs South-Eastern Asia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.