Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Kenya: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
40,461
in 2027
Kenya
2,811
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
12th
Kenya rank
11th

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
  • Kenya
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200520162027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income currently reports 40,461 against 2,811 in Kenya, a difference of 37,650.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's figure about 14.4 times Kenya's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 12th and Kenya ranks 11th of 87 groups.

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 41,835 1,090 40,745 Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2010s 42,124 1,356 40,768 Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2020s 42,906 2,538 40,368 Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income or Kenya?
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, at 40,461 against 2,811 in Kenya as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Kenya?
37,650, with Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Kenya?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Kenya rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 12th and Kenya ranks 11th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Kenya: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/kenya/">Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Kenya: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.