Uganda vs Yemen: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit
Uganda
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Yemen
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Uganda rank
23rd
Yemen rank
21st
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit over time
- Uganda
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Uganda, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.
Uganda ranks 23rd and Yemen ranks 21st of 185 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit, Uganda or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Uganda as of 2018.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit between Uganda and Yemen?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Yemen?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Uganda and Yemen rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit?
- Uganda ranks 23rd and Yemen ranks 21st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.