Hong Kong, China vs Samoa: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit

Hong Kong, China
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Samoa
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
175th
Samoa rank
172nd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Samoa
0000200520152025

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 175th and Samoa ranks 172nd of 185 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit, Hong Kong, China or Samoa?
Samoa, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit between Hong Kong, China and Samoa?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Samoa?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Samoa rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit?
Hong Kong, China ranks 175th and Samoa ranks 172nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Samoa: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/samoa/">Hong Kong, China vs Samoa: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 3,880 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.