Chad vs Yemen: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit
Chad
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Yemen
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Chad rank
20th
Yemen rank
21st
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit over time
- Chad
- Yemen
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Yemen, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 20th and Yemen ranks 21st of 185 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit, Chad or Yemen?
- Chad, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Yemen as of 2025.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit between Chad and Yemen?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Yemen?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Chad and Yemen rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit?
- Chad ranks 20th and Yemen ranks 21st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.